Is Tomba.io a better Apollo.io alternative for email finding?

In our public 5,000-lead benchmark (raw exports published), Tomba.io ranked #1 of 9 with 4,015 valid emails. Plans include verification credits, and searches that find nothing cost nothing.

How does Tomba.io pricing compare to Apollo.io?

Tomba.io starts at $49 a month (Basic: 2,500 searches and 2,500 verifications) and $89 a month (Growth: 5,000 of each). Apollo.io lists $149/user/mo for 6,000 credits. On Tomba.io, searches that find nothing cost nothing.

Can I migrate my data from Apollo.io to Tomba.io?

Yes. Export your existing leads from Apollo.io and import them into Tomba.io via CSV upload. Bulk jobs take up to 25,000 rows, and the docs have migration guides for several providers.

Does Tomba.io charge for invalid emails like Apollo.io?

No. A request is charged only when it returns a result, so a search that finds nothing costs nothing, and repeating a search in the same usage window is free.

Does the Apollo.io alternative include phone numbers?

Yes. Every Tomba.io plan includes the phone finder and the phone validator. Find direct mobile and business numbers from email addresses, domains, or LinkedIn profiles. A phone finder lookup costs 5 search credits, or 1 when you include the domain.

Is there a free plan to test before switching?

Yes. Tomba.io offers 25 free searches per month with no credit card required. This includes verification credits, browser extensions for Chrome, Firefox, Edge and Safari, the Google Sheets add-on, and full API access.

Apollo.io vs Hunter: which email finder is better?

Both Apollo.io and Hunter are popular email finders, but they differ in accuracy, pricing, and included features. In our public 5,000-lead benchmark Tomba.io found 4,015 valid emails against 1,882 for Hunter, and plans include verification credits and phone data.

Apollo.io vs Apollo: how do they compare?

Apollo.io and Apollo serve different needs. Apollo focuses on sales engagement while Apollo.io focuses on email finding. Tomba.io combines email finding, verification, phone data, and enrichment in one platform.

Apollo.io vs Snov.io: which should I choose?

Apollo.io and Snov.io both offer email finding, but differ in accuracy and pricing. Tomba.io found the most valid emails of the 9 tools in our public 5,000-lead benchmark (Snov.io found 1,007), and the Free plan has 25 searches a month.

What is the best Apollo.io alternative in 2026?

Tomba.io ranked #1 of 9 in our public 5,000-lead benchmark (4,015 valid emails, raw exports published), with verification credits on every plan, a phone finder, 13 official SDKs and a remote MCP server for AI workflows.

// apollo.io alternative

The Apollo.io Alternative That Charges Nothing for Empty Searches

Tomba.io ranked #1 of 9 in a public 5,000-lead benchmark, includes verification credits on every plan and does not charge for empty searches. See how it compares with Apollo.io.

Start free Full feature comparison

Apollo.io was not in the 5,000-lead benchmark. Average score per category, out of 5, from each tool's public pages.

Data: Data: Tomba.io 4.9 out of 5, Apollo.io 3.4 out of 5.
Verify: Verify: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Apollo.io 1.5 out of 5.
Developer: Developer: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Apollo.io 2.3 out of 5.
Workflow: Workflow: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Apollo.io 2.7 out of 5.
Price: Price: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Apollo.io 1.3 out of 5.

// 01 · at a glance

Apollo.io and Tomba.io, category by category

Average score per category, out of 5, over the features each tool has data for. A feature without data is left out, never counted.

Data: Data: Tomba.io 4.9 out of 5, Apollo.io 3.4 out of 5.
Verify: Verify: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Apollo.io 1.5 out of 5.
Developer: Developer: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Apollo.io 2.3 out of 5.
Workflow: Workflow: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Apollo.io 2.7 out of 5.
Price: Price: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Apollo.io 1.3 out of 5.

// what you gain

Data4.9 vs 3.4 · ahead on email finder, domain search, phone finder, enrichment
Verify5.0 vs 1.5 · adds no charge for empty searches
Developer5.0 vs 2.3 · adds MCP server
Workflow5.0 vs 2.7 · adds Sales Navigator, author finder
Price5.0 vs 1.3 · ahead on price a month, credits, pricing model

// what you keep

Both list email finder, domain search, phone finder, enrichment, company search, similar companies, technologies, email verifier and 13 more.

// 02 · switch your code

Move from the Apollo.io API in one change

The same request against both APIs, from the migration guide on docs.tomba.io. Tomba.io needs two headers, X-Tomba-Key and X-Tomba-Secret.

Apollo.io → Tomba.io

# Apollo.io
curl -X POST "https://api.apollo.io/api/v1/people/match?first_name=Richard&last_name=Hendricks&domain=piedpiper.com" \
  -H "x-api-key: $APOLLO_API_KEY"

# Tomba
curl "https://api.tomba.io/v1/email-finder?first_name=Richard&last_name=Hendricks&domain=piedpiper.com" \
  -H "X-Tomba-Key: $TOMBA_API_KEY" \
  -H "X-Tomba-Secret: $TOMBA_SECRET_KEY"

GET/email-finderA person's work email from their name and company domain1 search credit // migration guideMigrate from Apollo.ioParameters, fields and errors mapped one by one.

// 03 · side by side

Apollo.io vs Tomba.io

Plans, credits and features, with Apollo.io's figures from its public pages and Tomba.io's from its pricing page.

Apollo.io vs Tomba.io, feature by feature
Feature	Tomba.io	Apollo.io
Price a month	$89/mo	$149/user/mo
Credits	5,000	6,000
5,000-lead benchmark	#1 of 9 (4,015 valid)	Not tested
No charge for empty searches	✓ Yes	✗ No
Verification credits	5,000	0
Email finder	✓	✓
Email verifier	✓	Limited
Domain search	✓	✓
Phone finder	✓	Very limited
Bulk processing	✓	Limited
Official SDKs	✓	Limited
MCP server	✓	✗

Last reviewed April 14, 2026. Benchmark ranks come from our public 5,000-lead test; tools it did not include show "Not tested". All 36 features

// 04 · other alternatives

More Apollo.io alternatives

// 05 · evidence

Is Tomba.io really the best Apollo.io alternative?

Every vendor claims to beat the others. So a Apollo.io alternative that only asserts it is more accurate gives you nothing to check.

So we published the test instead of describing it. The same 5,000-lead file went through 9 providers. Nobody cleaned the input first. Nobody retried a failed row. Then we exported the raw sheets.

Tomba.io returned 4,015 valid emails. Anymailfinder returned 3,875, and Findymail 3,757. The file was identical for each tool, so the gap reflects coverage rather than luck. Open the result sheet and check any row yourself.

Where we fall short

No tool finds every address. Ours found 4,015 of 5,000, so about 20% of the file stayed empty. Coverage also varies by region and company size. So test on your own market, with your real list.

Switching from Apollo.io

Export your contact list. Run it through the verifier to see what still delivers. Rebuild the gaps with Domain Search or Bulk Tasks, then point your integration at the API. The Free plan has 25 searches a month, so you can test the claim on your own data first.

// valid emails from 5,000 leads raw data

#1Tomba.io4,015
#2Anymailfinder3,875
#3Findymail3,757
#4GetProspect3,096
#5Skrapp2,142
#6Hunter1,882
#7VoilaNorbert1,800
#8Snov1,007
#9Prospeo846

Tomba's own test, February 2026: 2,500 leads with a website and 2,500 with only a company name. Only addresses a tool labelled valid count.

// what customers say

Stellar product and amazing support. I have tested many tools and this one is far superior by far. I highly recommend it.
Martin EbongueEntrepreneur, Genius Data Flow
Team accounts & API! This is a brilliant feature as I can integrate this into our in house sales software. It also has CRM integrations and bulk tasks, so it helps to streamline our work.
Naz H.Marketing Consultantvia G2
If you are someone who requires quality leads & contact details on a regular basis, then you should definitely check out Tomba because it's not only the most affordable solution out there but also has a strong data power behind it.
Nafiur R.Founder & Mentorvia G2

// faq

Apollo.io alternative: questions

Still have questions? Visit the help center