// comparison
Tomba.io vs Adapt.io
36 features in five categories, scored from each tool's public pages, plus the public 5,000-lead benchmark. Last updated 2026-04-14.
8 of 36 features have no data for one of the two tools: shown as "–" and not counted.
// 01 · by category
Tomba.io vs Adapt.io, category by category
Average score per category, out of 5, over the features each tool has data for.
- Data
- Data: Tomba.io 4.9 out of 5, Adapt.io 2.1 out of 5.
- Verify
- Verify: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Adapt.io 1.3 out of 5.
- Developer
- Developer: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Adapt.io 2.5 out of 5.
- Workflow
- Workflow: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Adapt.io 1.6 out of 5.
- Price
- Price: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Adapt.io 1.7 out of 5.
// verdict
Pick Tomba.io for Data, Verify, Developer, Workflow and Price.
- Data
- Tomba.io7–0–0
- Verify
- Tomba.io4–0–0
- Developer
- Tomba.io4–0–0
- Workflow
- Tomba.io10–0–0
- Price
- Tomba.io3–0–0
Feature wins per category: Tomba.io–ties–Adapt.io.
// 02 · feature by feature
Tomba.io vs Adapt.io, side by side
The higher-scored value on each row is marked with a bar. Benchmark ranks come from our public 5,000-lead test; tools it did not include show 'Not tested', and '–' means no data.
| Feature | Tomba.io | Adapt.io |
|---|---|---|
| // Data | ||
| 5,000-lead benchmark | #1 of 9 (4,015 valid) | Not tested |
| Email finder | ✓ (better) | ✓ |
| Domain search | ✓ (better) | ✓ |
| Phone finder | ✓ (better) | ✓ |
| Enrichment | ✓ (better) | Basic |
| Free company enrichment | ✓ | – |
| Company search | ✓ (better) | Limited |
| Similar companies | ✓ (better) | ✗ |
| Technologies | ✓ (better) | ✗ |
| Email source data | ✓ | – |
| Data updates | Continuous | – |
| AI crawler | ✓ | – |
| Find from email, domain or LinkedIn | ✓ | – |
| Finder includes phone | ✓ | – |
| // Verify | ||
| Email verifier | ✓ (better) | ✗ |
| No charge for empty searches | ✓ Yes (better) | ✗ No |
| Verification credits | 5,000 (better) | 0 |
| Phone validator | ✓ (better) | ✓ |
| // Developer | ||
| API access | ✓ (better) | ✓ |
| API documentation | ✓ (better) | ✓ |
| Official SDKs | ✓ (better) | Limited |
| MCP server | ✓ (better) | ✗ |
| Webhooks | ✓ | – |
| // Workflow | ||
| Bulk processing | ✓ (better) | ✓ |
| Browser extensions | All browsers (better) | ✗ |
| Spreadsheets | ✓ (better) | Limited |
| LinkedIn finder | ✓ (better) | ✗ |
| Sales Navigator | ✓ (better) | ✗ |
| Apollo finder | ✓ (better) | ✗ |
| Data extraction | ✓ (better) | ✗ |
| Author finder | ✓ (better) | ✗ |
| Support | 24/7 (better) | |
| Compliance | GDPR (better) | Basic |
| // Price | ||
| Price a month | $89/mo (better) | $99/mo |
| Credits | 5,000 (better) | 1,000 |
| Pricing model | Pay per valid (better) | All credits |
// 03 · pricing
We'll let the pricing do the talking
Tomba.io's self-serve plans, with the same number of searches and verifications a month, next to Adapt.io.
Tomba.io
| Basic | $49/mo | 2,500 searches + 2,500 verifications |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | $89/mo | 5,000 searches + 5,000 verifications |
| Pro | $199/mo | 20,000 searches + 20,000 verifications |
| Pro Plus | $449/mo | 50,000 searches + 50,000 verifications |
Free plan: 25 searches a month. Yearly billing takes 25% off. Searches that find nothing cost nothing.
Adapt.io
- Price a month
- $99/mo
- Credits
- 1,000
- Pricing model
- All credits
- Verification credits
- 0
// 04 · the tomba.io calls
The endpoints behind the comparison
https://api.tomba.io/v1 · Send X-Tomba-Key and X-Tomba-Secret with every request.Every endpoint in the API reference How TombaBot works · Chrome extension · Adapt.io alternatives
// 05 · evidence
Tomba.io vs Adapt.io: which one actually finds more emails?
Feature tables only take you so far. A Tomba.io vs Adapt.io decision comes down to one question: which tool returns more valid emails from the same list?
So we published the test instead of describing it. The same 5,000-lead file went through 9 providers. Nobody cleaned the input first. Nobody retried a failed row. Then we exported the raw sheets.
Tomba.io returned 4,015 valid emails. Anymailfinder returned 3,875, and Findymail 3,757. The file was identical for each tool, so the gap reflects coverage rather than luck. Open the result sheet and check any row yourself.
Where we fall short
No tool finds every address. Ours found 4,015 of 5,000, so about 20% of the file stayed empty. Coverage also varies by region and company size. So test on your own market, with your real list.
Switching from Adapt.io
Export your contact list. Run it through the verifier to see what still delivers. Rebuild the gaps with Domain Search or Bulk Tasks, then point your integration at the API. The Free plan has 25 searches a month, so you can test the claim on your own data first.
- #1Tomba.io4,015
- #2
Anymailfinder3,875
- #3
Findymail3,757
- #4
GetProspect3,096
- #5
Skrapp2,142
- #6
Hunter1,882
- #7
VoilaNorbert1,800
- #8
Snov1,007
- #9
Prospeo846
Tomba's own test, February 2026: 2,500 leads with a website and 2,500 with only a company name. Only addresses a tool labelled valid count.
// what customers say
Stellar product and amazing support. I have tested many tools and this one is far superior by far. I highly recommend it.
Martin EbongueEntrepreneur, Genius Data FlowTeam accounts & API! This is a brilliant feature as I can integrate this into our in house sales software. It also has CRM integrations and bulk tasks, so it helps to streamline our work.
Naz H.Marketing Consultantvia G2 If you are someone who requires quality leads & contact details on a regular basis, then you should definitely check out Tomba because it's not only the most affordable solution out there but also has a strong data power behind it.
Nafiur R.Founder & Mentorvia G2