Skip to content

// comparison

Tomba.io vs Clay

36 features in five categories, scored from each tool's public pages, plus the public 5,000-lead benchmark. Last updated 2026-04-14.

Tomba.io wins 13, Clay wins 0, 15 ties, over 28 features both tools have data for.

8 of 36 features have no data for one of the two tools: shown as "–" and not counted.

// 01 · by category

Tomba.io vs Clay, category by category

Average score per category, out of 5, over the features each tool has data for.

Data
Data: Tomba.io 4.9 out of 5, Clay 2.6 out of 5.
Verify
Verify: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Clay 2.0 out of 5.
Developer
Developer: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Clay 2.5 out of 5.
Workflow
Workflow: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Clay 1.6 out of 5.
Price
Price: Tomba.io 5.0 out of 5, Clay 2.0 out of 5.

// verdict

Pick Tomba.io for Data, Verify, Developer, Workflow and Price.

Data
Tomba.io2 · 5 · 0
Verify
Tomba.io1 · 3 · 0
Developer
Tomba.io2 · 2 · 0
Workflow
Tomba.io6 · 4 · 0
Price
Tomba.io2 · 1 · 0

The figures per row: features Tomba.io wins · ties · features Clay wins.

// 02 · feature by feature

Tomba.io vs Clay, side by side

The higher-scored value on each row is marked with a bar. Benchmark ranks come from our public 5,000-lead test; tools it did not include show 'Not tested', and '–' means no data.

Tomba.io vs Clay, feature by feature
FeatureTomba.ioClay
// Data
5,000-lead benchmark #1 of 9 (4,015 valid)Not tested
Email finder ✓✓
Domain search ✓✓
Phone finder ✓✓
Enrichment ✓Basic
Free company enrichment ✓–
Company search ✓Limited
Similar companies ✓ (better)✗
Technologies ✓ (better)✗
Email source data ✓–
Data updates Continuous–
AI crawler ✓–
Find from email, domain or LinkedIn ✓–
Finder includes phone ✓–
// Verify
Email verifier ✓✓
No charge for empty searches ✓ Yes (better)✗ No
Verification credits 5,0000
Phone validator ✓✓
// Developer
API access ✓✓
API documentation ✓✓
Official SDKs ✓ (better)Limited
MCP server ✓ (better)✗
Webhooks ✓–
// Workflow
Bulk processing ✓✓
Browser extensions All browsers (better)✗
Spreadsheets ✓Limited
LinkedIn finder ✓ (better)✗
Sales Navigator ✓ (better)✗
Apollo finder ✓ (better)✗
Data extraction ✓ (better)✗
Author finder ✓ (better)✗
Support 24/7Email
Compliance GDPRBasic
// Price
Price a month $89/mo (better)$185/mo
Credits 5,000 (better)2,500
Pricing model Pay per validAll credits

// 03 · pricing

We'll let the pricing do the talking

Tomba.io's self-serve plans, with the same number of searches and verifications a month, next to Clay.

Tomba.io

Basic$49/mo 2,500 searches + 2,500 verifications
Growth$89/mo 5,000 searches + 5,000 verifications
Pro$199/mo 20,000 searches + 20,000 verifications
Pro Plus$449/mo 50,000 searches + 50,000 verifications

Free plan: 25 searches a month. Yearly billing takes 25% off. Searches that find nothing cost nothing.

Clay

Price a month
$185/mo
Credits
2,500
Pricing model
All credits
Verification credits
0

// 04 · the tomba.io calls

The endpoints behind the comparison

GET/email-finderA person's work email from their name and company domainCost:1 search credit
GET/domain-searchThe email addresses at a company, with names, roles and the company profileCost:1 search credit per 10 results
GET/email-verifierWhether an address is deliverable: syntax, MX, SMTP, catch-all and greylisting checksCost:1 verification credit
GET/phone-finderA person's phone number from their email, domain or LinkedIn URLCost:5 search credits
GET/linkedinThe work email of the person behind a LinkedIn profile URLCost:1 search credit
Base URL https://api.tomba.io/v1 · Send X-Tomba-Key and X-Tomba-Secret with every request.Every endpoint in the API reference

How TombaBot works · Chrome extension · Clay alternatives

// faq

Tomba.io vs Clay: questions

Still have questions? Visit the help center

// start free

See who Tomba finds at any company

Type a company's domain to see its people, their roles and verified work emails, each with the pages it was found on. Free account, no card.