Endole vs GetProspect: Which B2B Data Tool Wins in 2026?

TL;DR

• These are not the same category. Endole is a UK company-intelligence platform built on Companies House filings and credit data. GetProspect is a contact database and email finder with a LinkedIn extension. Comparing them is like comparing a land registry to a phone book.
• Pick Endole if your qualification depends on turnover, filing history, directors, credit risk, or "which UK companies grew 20%+ last year."
• Pick GetProspect if you already know who you want to sell to and need work email addresses attached to named humans, globally.
• Most teams end up needing both halves — company selection and contact discovery. That is where the stack usually breaks and budgets double.
• Endole is UK-only. If more than a third of your ICP sits outside the UK, it cannot be your primary source.

What is Endole and who actually uses it?#

Endole is a UK business intelligence platform. It ingests public filings from Companies House, layers on credit scores, financial ratios, group structures, director histories, and shareholding data, then makes that searchable through a product called Endole Explorer.

The typical Endole user is not a cold-email SDR. It is:

• A credit controller checking whether a prospective customer can pay a £40k invoice.
• A corporate finance or M&A analyst screening acquisition targets by EBITDA band.
• A field sales team building a territory list of UK manufacturers with 50–250 employees and rising turnover.
• A compliance or KYC function tracing beneficial ownership.

What you get out of Endole is a company-level answer. You can filter to "SIC code 62012, turnover £2m–£10m, incorporated before 2018, accounts filed on time, registered in Greater Manchester" and export that list. The output is a set of legal entities with addresses, phone numbers on the switchboard, filed accounts, and director names.

What you do not get is firstname.lastname@company.co.uk for the Head of Operations. Filings list directors, not decision-makers, and they never list email addresses.

What is GetProspect and how does it differ?#

GetProspect sits at the opposite end. It is a B2B contact database — tens of millions of person records — paired with a Chrome extension that pulls contact data off LinkedIn profiles and search results, plus a bulk email finder and a built-in verifier.

The workflow is person-first. You filter by job title, seniority, department, company headcount, industry, and location, then export names with work emails and (on higher tiers) phone numbers. Or you run a LinkedIn Sales Navigator search, click the extension, and pull the visible profiles into a list.

The core difference in one line: Endole tells you which companies are worth calling; GetProspect tells you who to email there. Endole's depth is financial and UK-bound. GetProspect's depth is people and global.

How do Endole and GetProspect compare head-to-head?#

Two things stand out in that table. First, the overlap between Endole and GetProspect is almost zero — one column is financial, one is human. Second, if outbound email is your goal, the real comparison is not Endole vs GetProspect at all; it is GetProspect vs other email finder tools.

Which data do you actually need to qualify a lead?#

Before you buy either, work out which layer is blocking you. Most B2B prospecting stacks need four distinct layers, and teams usually only lack one:

1. Account selection — which companies fit. Signals: SIC/NAICS code, headcount, revenue, growth, funding, tech stack. Endole owns this layer for UK targets. GetProspect covers it thinly with headcount and industry filters.
2. Contact identification — who inside the account holds budget. Job title, seniority, department, tenure. GetProspect owns this. Endole gives you registered directors, which is a weak proxy — the CFO on a filing is rarely the person who buys your software.
3. Contact reachability — a deliverable work email and, ideally, a direct dial. GetProspect and Tomba own this. Endole does not participate.
4. Risk and fit checks — can they pay, are they growing, are they insolvent. Endole owns this outright. Nobody else on this list touches it.
5. Ongoing freshness — people change jobs roughly every two to three years, so any exported contact list decays. This is an argument for API-based enrichment over one-off CSV exports, whichever vendor you pick.

If your problem is layer 1 or 4, Endole is the answer and no email finder will help. If your problem is layer 2 or 3, GetProspect is the answer and no filings database will help.

How much do Endole and GetProspect cost in 2026?#

Pricing is where the two products diverge again — Endole sells subscriptions and per-report credit, GetProspect sells contact credits.

Treat the non-Tomba figures as directional and confirm on each vendor's own pricing page — both change tiers regularly, and Endole quotes rather than publishes for most business plans. Tomba's numbers are exact: Free at 25 searches per month, Starter at $49/mo, Growth at $99/mo, Pro at $249/mo, and custom Enterprise. You can see the full breakdown on the Tomba pricing page.

The hidden cost in both products is the same: credits burned on records you never use. Endole exports include companies you disqualify on the second look. GetProspect credits get spent on contacts whose emails bounce or who left the company eight months ago. Which is why the verification layer matters more than the headline price.

What are the real limitations of each tool?#

Endole's limits:

• UK-only. No Irish, EU, or US coverage worth planning around.
• No individual work emails. You will still need a second tool.
• Filing data lags. Small companies file abbreviated accounts up to nine months after year end, so "current turnover" can be 18 months stale.
• Director records are legal roles, not buying roles. Great for KYC, weak for targeting a VP of Engineering.

GetProspect's limits:

• Company-level intelligence is shallow. Headcount bands and industry tags, not financials or risk scores.
• Coverage skews to companies with a strong LinkedIn presence. Traditional SMEs — the exact segment Endole is best at — are thin.
• Like every contact database, accuracy varies sharply by region and seniority. European and APAC mid-market records are weaker than US tech records.
• Credit consumption on bulk jobs can outrun expectations if you do not pre-filter.

Neither weakness is a dealbreaker on its own. Both become expensive when you assume the tool covers a layer it does not.

Which tool should you choose for your use case?#

• UK-focused field sales or credit-led selling → Endole first. Build the account list on financial criteria, then bolt on a contact tool to get emails for the names you shortlist.
• Global SaaS outbound to tech companies → GetProspect (or a comparable finder). Endole would only cover a fraction of your addressable market.
• Recruitment and staffing → GetProspect for candidate and hiring-manager contact, with Endole useful only if you place into UK SMEs and care about client solvency.
• RevOps building an enrichment pipeline → Neither, alone. You want an API you can call from your CRM on record creation. Endole's commercial licensing is heavier; GetProspect and Tomba both expose straightforward REST endpoints.
• Agencies running outbound for multiple clients → GetProspect's credit model scales more predictably than Endole's quote-led subscription.

If you want a wider view of how contact vendors stack up, G2's lead intelligence category is a reasonable place to sanity-check claimed accuracy against verified reviews.

Where does Tomba fit in the Endole vs GetProspect decision?#

Tomba competes with GetProspect, not with Endole. If you have settled the account-selection question — whether through Endole, your CRM, a conference list, or a scraped directory — the remaining job is turning company names into deliverable inboxes.

That is a narrow problem, and narrow tools solve it better:

• Domain search takes a company domain and returns every known email at it, with the detected pattern (first.last, finitial.last, and so on). Feed it a column of domains straight out of an Endole export.
• Email verification runs SMTP-level checks before you send, including a dedicated catch-all path — the case where most verifiers shrug and return "unknown."
• Bulk processing handles the 5,000-row CSV your list build produced, without you writing a script.
• API, CLI, and MCP access so enrichment runs inside your pipeline instead of as a manual export-import loop.

The practical stack for a UK-focused team looks like this: Endole for account selection and risk, Tomba for contact discovery and verification, your sequencer for delivery. For a global team, drop Endole and put a firmographic source in its place.

Endole vs GetProspect: what is the verdict?#

If you are choosing one and only one: pick Endole when the question you cannot answer is "which UK companies are worth my time and can pay me?" Pick GetProspect when the question you cannot answer is "how do I reach the right person at these companies?"

They are complements, not substitutes, and the comparison only feels like a fair fight because both get filed under "B2B data." The failure mode is buying Endole and expecting an outbound list, or buying GetProspect and expecting to know which prospects are financially healthy.

The layer that quietly determines your results is the last one — email accuracy. A perfect account list with a 22% bounce rate will torch your sending domain faster than a mediocre list with clean addresses.

Start with the reachability layer. Run your existing target list through the Tomba Email Finder on the free tier — 25 searches, no card — and check the hit rate against whatever you are using today. If the numbers hold, Starter at $49/mo covers most single-rep workloads, and the API is there when you are ready to move enrichment out of spreadsheets and into your pipeline.

Related guides#

• AroundDeal vs Endole (2026): B2B Data Platforms Compared
• Clodura.ai vs Endole 2026: B2B Data and Prospecting Compared
• BizKonnect vs Endole (2026): B2B Data Platforms Compared
• Brandnav vs Endole 2026: B2B Data & Email Finder Compared