EasyLeadz vs Endole: Which B2B Data Tool Wins in 2026?

Most "EasyLeadz vs Endole" comparisons are written by people who have never run a list build with either tool. The two products barely overlap. One is a contact-data vendor that sells phone numbers scraped and validated against LinkedIn profiles. The other is a UK company-intelligence database built on statutory filings. If you buy one expecting the other's output, you will burn a month of SDR time before you notice.

Here is what each one actually does, where the data comes from, what it costs, and which gaps you still have to fill after buying either.

TL;DR#

• EasyLeadz is a person-level contact tool. Its main value is direct mobile numbers pulled while you browse LinkedIn via the "Mr. E" extension. Global coverage, strongest in India and APAC.
• Endole is a company-level intelligence platform. It sits on top of UK Companies House filings — accounts, directors, group structures, credit scores. Almost no personal contact data.
• They solve different halves of the same problem. Endole tells you which UK company is worth calling. EasyLeadz tells you which number to dial. Neither reliably gives you verified work email at scale.
• Pricing models differ sharply. EasyLeadz meters credits per revealed contact; Endole meters subscription access to reports and lists. Cost per usable lead diverges fast.
• Most outbound teams need a third piece — a dedicated email finder with SMTP-level verification — because email is still where reply rates live.

What is EasyLeadz and who is it built for?#

EasyLeadz is a contact-intelligence vendor best known for Mr. E, a browser extension that reveals a prospect's direct phone number while you are viewing their LinkedIn profile. Point it at a profile, click, spend a credit, get a mobile number back.

The positioning is deliberately narrow: direct dials, not switchboard numbers. That matters because reaching a gatekeeper and reaching a decision-maker's pocket are different sales motions.

Where EasyLeadz is strong:

• India and South Asia coverage. The company is India-based and its data density there is genuinely better than most US-first vendors. If you sell into Indian SaaS, manufacturing, or services, this is a real differentiator.
• Speed of workflow. The extension is the product. No CSV round-trip, no list-building UI to learn.
• Phone-first intent. For teams whose primary channel is the phone, a tool optimised for mobile numbers beats a general database that treats phone as an afterthought.

Where it is thin:

• Email is secondary. You get emails on some records, but the verification story is weaker than dedicated tools, and catch-all domains routinely come back ambiguous.
• Firmographic depth. You get a person and a company name. You do not get filed accounts, shareholding structures, or credit risk.
• Bulk workflows. Credit-metered, per-reveal pricing punishes anyone building a 10,000-row list.

What is Endole and what data does it actually hold?#

Endole is a UK business information platform. Its foundation is public filing data from Companies House — every registered UK company must file annual accounts and confirmation statements, and Endole ingests, structures, scores, and resells that.

What you get:

• Full financial history: turnover where filed, balance sheets, net worth trends
• Director and shareholder records, including cross-company directorships
• Group structure mapping — parents, subsidiaries, ultimate owners
• Credit scores and risk indicators
• Endole Explorer, a list-building layer that lets you filter the UK register by SIC code, turnover band, employee count, region, and growth signals

What you do not get: personal mobile numbers, verified work emails at scale, or meaningful data outside the UK and Ireland. Endole is a UK register product. That is its strength and its ceiling.

For a credit team, a due-diligence analyst, or a UK-only SDR who needs to segment by filed turnover rather than a guessed employee count, Endole's data is more defensible than any scraped "revenue estimate" you will find in a US contact database.

EasyLeadz vs Endole: how do they compare head-to-head?#

Read that table and the conclusion writes itself: this is not a like-for-like fight. The only honest framing is which layer of your data stack are you buying.

Which one is better for outbound prospecting?#

Depends on where your market is and which channel you run.

Pick EasyLeadz if: you sell globally or into India, your team dials, and your bottleneck is "I found the right person on LinkedIn but I cannot reach them." Direct dials at reveal-time is a clean fit.

Pick Endole if: your total addressable market is UK-registered companies, and your qualification depends on hard financials — you only want firms with filed turnover above £2M, or you need to avoid companies with deteriorating credit scores. No contact tool will give you that.

Pick neither, alone, if: you run email as your primary channel. This is the case for most B2B teams, and it is the honest gap in this comparison. EasyLeadz treats email as a bonus field. Endole treats individual contacts as out of scope. You will end up with a beautifully qualified account list and no deliverable inbox to write to.

That third slot is where a purpose-built finder belongs. Run Endole to build the UK account list, then push domains through domain search to pull every published email pattern on those domains, then run the output through an email verifier before a single send. Cost per verified contact drops well below what a per-reveal credit model charges.

What do EasyLeadz and Endole cost in 2026?#

Both vendors adjust pricing regularly, so treat these as directional and confirm on their own pages before you buy.

Three things to notice:

1. Per-reveal credits get expensive at volume. A 5,000-contact quarter on a reveal model is not a $59 problem. Model your real volume before comparing headline prices.
2. Endole's cheap entry tier is misleading in the other direction. Basic profiles are free because the underlying filings are public. You pay for structure, scoring, and search — and the useful list-building features sit on higher tiers.
3. Wasted spend hides in unverified records. Paying for a contact that bounces costs you twice: the credit and the sender reputation. Check Tomba pricing against your actual verified-contact volume rather than raw record count.

Where do both tools leave gaps you still have to fill?#

Run either one for a quarter and the same four holes appear.

1. Email verification depth. Neither vendor's core competency is SMTP-level validation, catch-all handling, or role-account filtering. If your bounce rate creeps past 3%, mailbox providers start throttling you regardless of how good your copy is.
2. Catch-all domains. A large share of mid-market B2B domains accept everything at the MX layer, which makes naive verification useless. You need a catch-all verifier that probes beyond a simple accept-all response.
3. Refresh cadence. Endole's filings update on the statutory schedule — annual accounts can be 9 to 21 months behind reality. EasyLeadz records decay as people change jobs. Neither self-heals your CRM.
4. Enrichment across the whole record. You will want firmographics, socials, tech stack, and contact in one row. That normally means stitching, either manually or through data enrichment against a single API.
5. Non-UK coverage. The moment your ICP crosses the Channel, Endole stops being useful and you need a global source.
6. Compliance posture. UK/EU prospecting carries GDPR obligations around legitimate interest and personal data — including mobile numbers. Review both vendors' data-processing terms before you scale dialling.

Independent user reviews on G2 are the fastest sanity check on decay rates and support quality, since neither vendor publishes an audited accuracy figure the way a verification tool does.

How should you actually stack these tools?#

The teams that get this right stop treating it as "vs" and build a layered pipeline.

Layer 1 — Account selection. Endole for UK targets. Filter by SIC code, filed turnover, employee band, credit score, and growth trend. Export the domain list. If you sell outside the UK, replace this layer with your own ICP criteria plus a global database.

Layer 2 — Contact discovery. Take the domains and find the humans. Domain search returns every discoverable address on a company with its pattern and confidence. This is the layer where per-reveal credit models start hurting your margin, so watch the unit economics.

Layer 3 — Verification. Every address gets validated before it enters the sequencer. No exceptions. This is not optional hygiene; it is the single biggest lever on deliverability.

Layer 4 — Phone augmentation. For the accounts that matter, add a direct dial. EasyLeadz is legitimately good here, especially in APAC. You can also run phone finder for B2B numbers alongside the email record so both channels live in one row.

Layer 5 — Automation. Push the whole enriched record into your CRM through the Tomba API or a no-code connector so nobody is exporting CSVs by hand at 6pm on a Friday.

Layers 1 and 4 are where EasyLeadz and Endole earn their money. Layers 2 and 3 are where both leave you exposed.

Is EasyLeadz better than Endole?#

For phone-led outbound to a global or Indian ICP: yes, comfortably. Endole simply does not sell personal contact data.

For UK account qualification, credit risk, and financial screening: no, and it is not close. EasyLeadz has no filings, no group structures, no risk scores.

The right question is not which tool wins. It is which failure mode costs you more — calling the wrong companies with perfect phone numbers, or identifying perfect companies you cannot reach. Endole prevents the first. EasyLeadz prevents the second. A verified email layer prevents the third and most common one: reaching the right person at the right company through an address that bounces.

Frequently asked questions#

Does Endole provide email addresses? Only generic company-level contacts pulled from filings and public sources — typically info@ or a registered-office address. It is not built for person-level email discovery.

Does EasyLeadz work outside India? Yes, coverage is global, but density and refresh quality are strongest in India and wider APAC. Test your specific ICP segment on a trial before committing to an annual plan.

Can I use Endole data for cold outreach legally? Company filing data is public, but the moment you attach a named individual and contact them, UK GDPR applies. Document your legitimate-interest assessment and honour opt-outs.

What is the cheapest way to get verified emails for a UK list? Build the account list from filings, extract domains, then run bulk discovery and verification in one pass rather than paying per individual reveal. The bulk email finder workflow exists precisely for this shape of job.

The bottom line#

EasyLeadz and Endole are complements sold as competitors. Endole answers "which UK company deserves my time." EasyLeadz answers "what number do I dial." Neither answers "what verified inbox do I write to" — and for most B2B teams, that is still where the pipeline comes from.

If email is your primary channel, put the finder layer first and build outward. Start with the Tomba Email Finder on the free tier — 25 searches a month, no card — and run it against ten accounts you already know well. Compare what comes back with what your current stack returns. If the verified-address rate is higher, you have found your layer 2. Scale from $49/mo, and keep Endole for UK qualification and EasyLeadz for direct dials where they genuinely earn their place.

Related guides#

• Arounddeal vs Easyleadz 2026: B2B Contact Data Compared
• Ampliz vs EasyLeadz 2026: Which B2B Data Tool Wins?
• AroundDeal vs Endole (2026): B2B Data Platforms Compared
• Adaptio vs EasyLeadz 2026: Which B2B Sales Tool Wins?